“... I cannot think that it is altogether an accident that the Austrian Institut für Konjunkturforschung, of which Dr. Hayek is director, was one of the very few bodies of its kind which, in the spring of 1929, predicted a setback in America with injurious repercussions on European conditions” (Hayek 1931: xi-xii).Robbins refers here to the Österreichische Konjunkturforschungsinstitut (Austrian Institute for Business Cycle Research). This opened in 1927, and Hayek was appointed as the first director (Hayek 1991: 125, n. 1; Steele 2001: 8–9; for the foundation of the Institute by Mises, see Hülsmann 2007: 575-576). Hayek wrote nearly all the monthly reports (“Monatsberichte” in German) of the institute for four years, and only obtained the assistance of Oskar Morgenstern as his collaborator in 1929 (Hayek 1991: 125, n. 1; Ebenstein 2003: 44; cf. Hülsmann 2007: 576: “Hayek himself wrote the first, very lengthy report [sc. of the “Monatsberichte”] ... Over the years, [sc. Hayek] ... relied more and more on contributions from others”).
Hansjörg Klausinger, in an excellent chapter in an edited monograph on Austrian economics, has recently charged that, “browsing through the monthly bulletins of the institute, it is difficult to discover anything that comes close to corroborating Robbin’s statement” (Klausinger 2010: 227). I am rather gratified that a reading of Klausinger (2010) confirms my own analysis of this very question here:
“Hayek and the Stock Market Crash of 1929: So Much for His Predictive Powers,” December 28, 2011.I wrote this before reading Klausinger.
Klausinger also notes that Hayek’s “Monatsberichte” made very significant use of the “Harvard Economic Service” (a publication of the Harvard University Committee on Economic Research) and the Harvard barometer, and rarely engaged in much more than an “eclectic interpretation of these” (Klausinger 2010: 227).
This is easily verified. In a report from November 1928, we have the following (with my translation of the German):
“Harvard Economic Service meint, daß, wenn nicht unerwartete, jetzt nicht erkennbare Faktoren zu einer Liquidation am Effektenmarkt führen sollten, die ersten Monate 1929 eine neue Anspannung am Kapitalsmarkt bringen dürften. Die Kreditsituation sei als heikel und schwierig, nicht aber als gefährlich zu bezeichnen. Doch wenn die Krediterweiterung weiter fortgesetzt wird, wird man in einem Jahr einer noch viel schwierigeren und heikleren Situation gegenüberstehen. Die Position der Federal Reserve-Banken ist allerdings stark genug, um noch längere Zeit Kreditexpansion betreiben zu können und die Zeit der großen Wirtschaftskrise dürfte noch recht weit entfernt sein, wenn dies auch vorübergehende kleinere Liquidationsperioden nicht ausschließt.”As I have said before, what is clear is that American forecasters were predicting some kind of crisis in 1929. Hayek picked up on that, and noted it here.
“[The] Harvard Economic Service thinks that factors not now apparent/recognizable, if not unexpected/unforeseen, should lead to a liquidation effect on the market, [and] the first months of 1929 may be expected to bring a new strain in the capital market. The credit situation is to be described as awkward and difficult, but not as dangerous. But, if the credit expansion is continued, we will face in a year an even more difficult and awkward situation. The position of the Federal Reserve banks, however, is strong enough to be able to conduct credit expansion for quite some time, and a time of great economic crisis is likely to be still quite far away, even if this does not exclude periods of temporary smaller liquidation.”
Monatsberichte des österreichischen Institutes für Konjunkturforschung, 2. Jahrgang, Nr. 11. (26 November, 1928). p. 174.
Moreover, Hayek thought that a “great economic crisis is likely to be still quite far away” (“großen Wirtschaftskrise dürfte noch recht weit entfernt sein”). “Still quite far away” (“noch recht weit entfernt”) sounds like a number of years to me, not one year. This is yet another problem for the view that Hayek was some kind of prescient oracle.
There is a second relevant passage in an October 26, 1929 issue of the Monatsberichte (my translation follows):
“Jedoch besteht derzeit kein Grund, einen plötzlichen Zusammenbruch der New Yorker Börse zu erwarten. Allerdings ist es nicht ausgeschlossen, daß nunmehr das Ende der geradezu phantastischen Kurssteigerungen gekommen ist und das Niveau langsam abbröckeln dürfte.There is a strong likelihood that Hayek wrote this, or possibly as a co-author with Oskar Morgenstern (it is clear from p. 186 of the issue that Hayek is listed as the editor: “Verantwortlicher Schriftleiter: Dr. Friedrich A. Hayek”).
Die Kredit Möglichkeiten sind jedenfalls augenblicklich noch sehr große und es erscheint daher die Gewähr gegeben, daß eine ausgesprochen krisenhafte Zerstörung des jetzigen hohen Niveaus nicht befürchtet werden müßte. Zur Zeit werden europäische Gelder bereits in großen Beträgen abgezogen, so daß der Dollarkurs gedrückt ist.”
“However, at present there is no reason to expect a sudden crash of the New York stock exchange. However, it is not impossible that the end of the absolutely amazing price increases has arrived, and [that] the [price] level should slowly crumble. The credit possibilities/conditions are, at any rate, currently very great, and therefore it appears assured that an outright crisis-like destruction of the present high [sc. price] level should not be feared. At the moment, European funds are already being withdrawn in large amounts, so that the value of the [US] dollar is down.” Monatsberichte des österreichischen Institutes für Konjunkturforschung, 3. Jahrgang, Nr. 10 (26 October, 1929), p. 182.
So here a few days before the historic stock market crash of October 28, 1929 (Black Monday) and October 29 (Black Tuesday), a crash which continued until November 13, 1929, we have Hayek predicting
(1) no “sudden crash of the New York stock exchange”;All wrong.
(2) the possibility of a slow fall in stock market prices, and
(3) an “outright crisis-like destruction of the present high [sc. price] level should not be feared.”
Hansjörg Klausinger (2010: 227) concludes that we still lack “convincing evidence of a prediction that conformed to what Robbins suggested in his foreword.”
And Klausinger is entirely correct. The Austrians’ predictive powers regarding the Great Depression are grossly exaggerated, and Hayek’s in particular.
Ebenstein, A. O. 2003. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Hayek, F. A. von, 1931. Prices and Production, G. Routledge & Sons, Ltd, London.
Hayek, F. A. von. 1991. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. Volume 3. The Trend of Economic Thinking: Essays on Political Economists and Economic History (ed. W. W. Bartley and S. Kresge), Routledge, London.
Hayek, F. A. von. 1994. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue (eds. S. Kresge and L. Wenar), Routledge, London.
Hülsmann, J. G. 2007. Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
Klausinger, Hansjörg. 2010. “Hayek on Practical Business Cycle Research: A Note,” in H. Hagemann, T. Nishizawa, Y. Ikeda (eds.), Austrian Economics in Transition: From Carl Menger to Friedrich Hayek, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. 218–234.
Steele, G. R. 2001. Keynes and Hayek: The Money Economy, Routledge, London and New York.
(1) The thesis of that article is absurd.ReplyDelete
Mises did not predict the Great Depression, but the failure of Kreditanstalt in Vienna:
Mises is alleged to have warned his future wife that “a great crash” was coming, but I have seen no evidence to suggest he was referring to America or a global depression by that remark, or anything other than the Kreditanstalt bank with that statement.
(2) Mises's ABCT did predict the boom of the 1920s and crash. A stock market boom and crash and banking crisis has nothing to do with Mises's theory of higher-order capital goods investments.
Mises is alleged to have warned his future wife that “a great crash” was coming, but I have seen no evidence to suggest he was referring to America or a global depression by that remark, or anything other than the Kreditanstalt bank with that statement.ReplyDelete
Since when was "a great crash" a reference to an individual bank? When Mises said "crash", he was referring to the economy, just like he was referring to the economy when he used the word "crash" here:
"It is necessary to realize that the price premium is the outgrowth of speculations anticipating changes in the money relation. What induces it, in the case of the expectation that an inflationary trend will keep on going, is already the first sign of that phenomenon which later, when it becomes general, is called “flight into real values” and finally produces the crack-up boom and the crash of the monetary system concerned." - pg 544, Human Action.
"The longing for security became especially intense in the great depression that started in 1929. It met with an enthusiastic response from the millions of unemployed. That is capitalism for you, shouted the leaders of the pressure groups of the farmers and the wage earners. Yet the evils were not created by capitalism, but, on the contrary, by the endeavors to “reform” and to “improve” the operation of the market economy by interventionism. The crash was the necessary outcome of the attempts to lower the rate of interest by credit expansion. Institutional unemployment was the inevitable result of the policy of fixing wage rates above the potential market height." - Ibid pg 853.
"The economist knows that such a boom must result in a depression. But he does not and cannot know when the crisis will appear. This depends on the special conditions of each case. Many political events can influence the outcome. There are no rules according to which the duration of the boom or of the following depression can be computed. And even if such rules were available, they would be of no use to businessmen. What the individual businessman needs in order to avoid losses is knowledge about the date of the turning point at a time when other businessmen still believe that the crash is farther away than is really the case." - Ibid pg 870-871.
Mises's ABCT did predict the boom of the 1920s and crash.
Yes it did. It's why he didn't want anything to do with the monetary system because he knew a crash was coming.