Sunday, March 30, 2014

What is Wrong with Neoclassical Economics?

The list is a long one and includes practically every major theory:
(1) classical loanable funds theory, with time preference explaining the interest rate;

(2) Wicksell’s natural rate of interest;

(3) neutral rates of interest;

(4) rational expectations;

(5) the belief that real world market economies can be modelled with single representative agent models where agents maximise utility;

(6) Ricardian equivalence;

(7) belief in a real world tendency to general equilibrium;

(8) belief that money is neutral (whether in the short or long run, or in the long run);

(9) the quantity theory of money;

(10) the law of demand as a universal law;

(11) the law of diminishing marginal utility as a universal law;

(12) the law of diminishing marginal productivity;

(13) the belief that firms equate price with marginal cost or move price towards marginal cost;

(14) the belief that agents maximise utility in the neoclassical sense;

(15) the belief that involuntary unemployment is fundamentally caused by inflexible wages.

(16) the idea that macroeconomics needs rigorous microfoundations.
After all these have been thrown aside, there is not much left of mainstream economics.
Posted by at
Labels:

11 comments:

  1. RamananMarch 30, 2014 at 5:10 AM

    Nice list.

    I'll also add the neoclassical production function.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rob RawlingsMarch 30, 2014 at 7:22 AM

    This list should really be called "things that some (but not all) economists who I characterize as neo-classical believe and that I disagree with".

    I very much doubt if there is an economist alive who believes in all 16 of those things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownMarch 30, 2014 at 11:01 PM

      Yeah, but the major problem with neoclassical economics is that a majority of mainstream economists believe in most of those articles (perhaps because they learned it in colledge). Just because some neoclassical economists work against some of those things, the whole consensus is unchallenged. That makes the whole neoclassical doctrine invincible and self-perpetuating.

      Delete
  3. PhilippeMarch 30, 2014 at 10:14 AM

    (17) The belief that wages are determined by the marginal productivity of labour, and that profit is determined by the marginal productivity of capital.

    See this:

    http://www.opendemocracy.net/openeconomy/tim-bending/fairness-and-post-keynesian-foundations

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mike HubenMarch 30, 2014 at 6:20 PM

    Should Rational Choice Theory be added too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lord KeynesApril 2, 2014 at 7:25 AM

      Well, yes, but I think it comes under (4) and (14) above.

      Delete
  5. PhilippeApril 2, 2014 at 4:55 AM

    I don't know if you saw this, LK:

    Marc Lavoie

    http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2014/03/essentials-heterodox-post-keynesian-economics.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lord KeynesApril 2, 2014 at 7:24 AM

      Thanks for this link.

      A great talk, and I have linked to it here:

      http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2014/04/marc-lavoie-on-heterodox-and-post.html

      Delete
  6. Wydawnictwo HeterodoxApril 16, 2016 at 5:24 AM

    Hello LK,

    I would like to ask your permission to translate some of your excellent posts into Polsih and publish it on my webpage(with indication of the source of course)

    http://heterodox.pl/en/

    Would it be possible?

    Please let me know if you have some questions about the nature of our project: m.czachor@heterodox.pl

    Kind regards,

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)