Steve Keen, with other speakers, talks here on the “Reformation of Economics”:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Useful Pages
- Home
- Debunking Austrian Economics 101 (Updated)
- Debunking Marxism 101 (Updated)
- Post Keynesian Economics 101
- Post Keynesian Price Theory 101
- The Nature, Origin and History of Money 101
- 19th Century Economic History
- Debunking Foucault’s Philosophy 101
- Analytic Philosophy 101
- Mark-up Pricing in 21 Nations and the Eurozone: the Empirical Evidence
- Sources and Data for US Economic History under the Gold Standard
- Probability Theory 101
- Keynesian Uncertainty 101
- The US Recession of 1920–1921
- A Bibliography on Logic and Reasoning
- Say’s Law: History and Critique
- The Natural Rate of Interest: A History and Critiq...
- Why Marx’s Labour Theory of Value is Wrong (in a Nutshell)
- Debunking Postmodernism and the Regressive Left 101
Lork Keynes, please do your comment on this articles:
ReplyDeleteHartwig, J. 2007. Keynes versus the Post Keynesians on the principle of effective demand, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 14, no. 4
«Indeed, Champernowne (1936) was the only review article of the General Theory at the time that stressed expectations as one of its major features and integrated them into the equations (Brady 2017b). Patinkin (1990, pp. 212-13) inaccurately asserted that Champernowne belonged with other reviewers (Hicks, Lange, Lerner, Hansen, Harrod, Reddaway, Meade) who excluded uncertainty from the main components of Keynes’s 1936 book.» // Boianovsky, Mauro (2017) : Between Pigou and Keynes: Champernowne on employment and expectations, CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2017-21