A Bibliography on Logic and Reasoning

These provide excellent introductions to logic, formal deductive and inductive argument, and reasoning:

Copi, Irving, Cohen, Carl and Kenneth McMahon. 2011. Introduction to Logic (14th edn.). Prentice Hall, Boston, Mass. and London.

Hacking, Ian. 2001. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd edn.). Routledge, London.

Lipton, Peter. 2007. “Précis of Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd Edition,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74.2: 421–423.

Manktelow, K. I. 2012. Thinking and Reasoning: An Introduction to the Psychology of Reason, Judgment and Decision Making. Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex and New York.

Pirie, Madsen. 2007. How to Win every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic. Continuum, London.

Skyrms, B. 2000. Choice and Chance (4th edn.). Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

Soccio, Douglas J. and Vincent E. Barry. 1997. Practical Logic: An Antidote for Uncritical Thinking (5th edn.). Cengage Learning.

Bennett, Bo. 2012. Logically Fallacious: The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies. AueBookIt.com.

Buonomano, Dean. 2011. Brain Bugs: How the Brain’s Flaws Shape our Lives. W.W. Norton, New York and London.

For mathematics and reasoning, see:

Seife, Charles. 2010. Proofiness: The Dark Arts of Mathematical Deception. Viking, New York.

Paulos, John Allen. 1990. Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences. Penguin, London.

On statistics and its pitfalls, see:

Bram, Uri. 2012. Thinking Statistically (2nd edn.). Createspace.

For a longer bibliography on inductive reasoning, see:

John M. Vickers, “Inductive Reasoning,” Oxford Bibliographies.

Of course, inductive reasoning is strongly related to probability (and, above all, epistemic probability). Good introductions to probability include the following:

Galavotti, M. C. 2005. Philosophical Introduction to Probability. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

Gillies, D. 2000. Philosophical Theories of Probability. Routledge, London.

Hacking, Ian. 2006. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference (2nd rev. edn.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Hacking, Ian. 2001. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Mellor, D. H. 2005. Probability: A Philosophical Introduction. Routledge, London.

Informal logical fallacies present an omnipresent problem in argument and reasoning, and these can be divided into:

(1) Fallacies of relevance;
(2) Fallacies of defective induction;
(3) Fallacies of presumption;
(4) Fallacies of ambiguity (sophism).

A detailed list of the fallacies can be seen here:

(1) Fallacies of Relevance

Irrelevant Appeals

Appeal to emotion (argument ad populum)

Appeal to pity (argument ad misericordiam)

Appeal to Force (argumentum ad baculum)

Appeal to Authority (argumentum ad verecundiam)

Appeal to nature (argument from nature)

Appeal to Ignorance (argumentum ad ignoratiam)

Red herring fallacy

Irrelevant Conclusion (ignoratio elenchi)

Straw man argument

Ad Hominem Argument

Poisoning the well

Guilt by association

Naturalistic fallacy

Moralistic Fallacy

Argument from silence (argumentum ex silentio)

Genetic fallacy

Gambler’s Fallacy

Tu quoque

(2) Fallacies of defective induction

Argument from Ignorance (ad ignorantiam)

Appeal to Inappropriate Authority (ad verecundiam)

False cause

Hasty generalization

Faulty generalization

Other inductive fallacies

Slothful induction

Overwhelming exception

Biased sample

Misleading vividness

Statistical special pleading

(3) Fallacies of presumption (fallacies of illegitimate presumption)

Complex question

False cause

Begging the question

Accident

Converse accident

No True Scotsman Fallacy (fallacy of ambiguity and presumption)

(4) Fallacies of ambiguity (sophisms)

Fallacy of equivocation

Fallacy of amphiboly

Fallacy of accent

Fallacy of composition

Fallacy of Division

Other fallacies relevant to economics include the following:

(1) Paradox of thrift/saving
(2) Paradox of costs
(3) Paradox of debt
(4) Paradox of liquidity
(5) Paradox of tranquillity (Minsky).

Links
“Informal Logical Fallacies and Cognitive Biases,” June 28, 2011.

External Links
Bradley Dowden, “Fallacies,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Changing minds and persuasion
http://changingminds.org/

List of cognitive biases
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

Edward Feser,“What is an ad hominem Fallacy?,” April 18, 2013.