(1) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 1,” January 16, 2014.
(2) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 2,” January 17, 2014.
(3) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 3,” January 18, 2014.
(4) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 4,” January 21, 2014.
(5) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 5,” January 21, 2014.
(6) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 6,” January 22, 2014.
(7) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 7,” January 23, 2014.
(8) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 8,” January 23, 2014.
(9) “Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 9,” January 23, 2014.
Thursday, January 23, 2014
Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter by Chapter Summaries
Below are links to my various posts giving chapter by chapter summaries of Paul Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: A Realist Approach (Cheltenham, UK, 1999).
Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: Chapter 9
Chapter 9 of Paul Downward’s Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: A Realist Approach (Cheltenham, UK, 1999) presents his conclusions.
Downward concludes that critical realism is the appropriate method for Post Keynesian economics (Downward 1999: 181).
For Downward, the
Econometric studies are only a limited and incomplete form of evidence on pricing and the fundamental empirical work must remain qualitative case studies (Downward 1999: 183).
Demand obviously influences flexprices, and it can influence mark-up prices too, but does so to a lesser degree than costs. Downwards’ own research finds that “prices display considerable inertia” (Downward 1999: 184).
Businesses’ general unwillingness to change prices is rational, and is part of their behavioural attempts to overcome uncertainty and stabilise expectations (Downward 1999: 187).
These conclusions are highly problematic for neoclassical economics.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Downward, Paul. 1999. Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: A Realist Approach. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA.
Downward concludes that critical realism is the appropriate method for Post Keynesian economics (Downward 1999: 181).
For Downward, the
“behavioural ‘core’ of post Keynesian pricing theory can be identified through the focus on the mark-up. In deference to research on actual agent decision making under conditions of uncertainty, post Keynesians should emphasise that prices are set by firms adding a mark-up to some measure of average costs. The mark-up is determined ex ante in the uncertain pursuit of some (possibly multiple) objective(s).” (Downward 1999: 181).This is in contrast to neoclassical economics that neglects overhead/fixed costs, and frequently has unrealistic assumptions in its behaviour theory.
Econometric studies are only a limited and incomplete form of evidence on pricing and the fundamental empirical work must remain qualitative case studies (Downward 1999: 183).
Demand obviously influences flexprices, and it can influence mark-up prices too, but does so to a lesser degree than costs. Downwards’ own research finds that “prices display considerable inertia” (Downward 1999: 184).
Businesses’ general unwillingness to change prices is rational, and is part of their behavioural attempts to overcome uncertainty and stabilise expectations (Downward 1999: 187).
These conclusions are highly problematic for neoclassical economics.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Downward, Paul. 1999. Pricing Theory in Post-Keynesian Economics: A Realist Approach. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
